The System's Self-Destruct Sequence Cannot Be Turned Off
The artificial hill of pottery shards is puny and localized; the consewuences of our system will bring down the system in ways the system is completely blind to.
We're all familiar with the plot device of the self-destruct sequence counting down while our hero / heroine frantically tries to find the kill switch that turns it off. The system--however we choose to describe it--is self-destructing and there's no switch to turn it off.
We're drawn to the notion that cabals and conspiracies are the root source of the system's ills. If these cabals were exposed and disempowered, then the system would quickly right itself and all would be well again.
Cabals and conspiracies are not the source, they're a symptom of a deeper, structural self-destruct mechanism, a mechanism we take for granted as the way the world works.
Regardless of ideological label--capitalist, socialist, communist--all systems are markets of some kind with producers, sellers and buyers / consumers. The market may be more or less open, or more or less controlled by the state, warlords or cartels, but in all cases there are producers, sellers and consumers.
In all cases, neither the producer, the seller nor the consumer have any responsibility for the downstream consequences of what's produced, sold and purchased. Every participant is incentivized to maximize their self-interest without regard for the future consequences of this pursuit of self-interest.
The producer of the plastic bottle has no responsibility for what happens to the bottle after production, the seller has no responsibility for what happens to the bottle after it's sold, and the consumer who tosses it in the river after consuming the contents has no responsibility for what happens to the bottle once they're done consuming the product.
The market has no internal, intrinsic responsibility for the consequences of narrow self-interest nor any mechanism that looks beyond the present. The market is blind to future consequences, and imposes no responsibility to do so on any participant.
The only possible result of this system is self-destruction. Consider the Great Pacific Garbage Gyre, the poetic name for a floating mass of plastic and other waste generated by the "growth at any cost" global economy roughly the size of Texas. (See chart below.) This is not the only garbage patch in the planet's oceans; it's merely one of the biggest.
Who cares about a floating island of garbage? It's harmless, right? Indeed. Can the same be said of the "forever" chemicals, the depleted freshwater aquifers, the mountains of electronic and other waste leaking toxic sludge and the rest of the consequences of a system that is blind to everything but "growth at any cost," self-interest and the eternal Now?
Cabals and conspiracies attract our attention because they are intentionally cloaking the destructive consequences their self-interest is passing on to others. The tobacco cabal worked diligently for decades to obfuscate the deadly consequences of smoking, as the means of maximizing their profits / self-interest.
So let's identify the cabal that intentionally created the Great Pacific Garbage Gyre to further their self-interest. Do we finger the producers of the 300 million tons of plastics produced annually, or the corporations that sold the 300 million tons of plastics, or the consumers who bought the 300 million tons of plastics?
The waste stream is generated by the system, not a cabal, and the system is constructed of values and what I call the mythology of Progress, a mythology of make-believe and play-acting, in which we watch a video of a group recycling a tiny sliver of the waste generated by global tourism and then declare, "See? Technology is solving the problems created by the system! No worries, it will all get solved by new technologies."
Absolved by this magical-thinking, we're free to continue pursuing our part of consequence-free "growth at any cost." This is the internal logic of the market-system, and it operates the same under any ideological label.
In theory, political rulers are supposed to the future consequences, but rulers only rule by authority granted in the present moment. If their supporters are forced to sacrifice for some distant benefit, they will find someone else to support.
Every civilization that produces "forever" goods ends up creating mountains of waste. Broken pottery shards pile up into artificial hills. But the scale of the modern system is so colossal that the consequences are now planetary, affecting our health and complex systems we don't fully understand, much less control. The artificial hill of pottery shards is puny and localized; the consequences of our system will bring down the system in ways the system is completely blind to.
Even if technology consolidated the Great Pacific Garbage Gyre at enormous expense, what would we do with the artificial garbage island? And since the system spews out 300 million tons of new plastic every year, a new Great Pacific Garbage Gyre will soon form.
There is no "off" switch on the system's self-destruct sequence. We'll only notice, or care, when the system started breaking down under the crushing weight of the consequences that have been piling up and ignored with play-acting solutions such as recycling.
Thank you all for the wide-ranging comments.
John, you've perfectly expressed what many of us have concluded and what we see as the way forward: life rafts we own and control as much as possible. Over time, this establishes networks of like-minded people who help sustain each other not as charity but as productive people generating essentials and community. As you say, few see the life raft as preferable to clinging on to the dessert cart on the Titanic.
Juli, I have a 1973 copy of "Small Is Beautiful" by my desk, along with a copy of "The Great Transformation" by Karl Polanyi I just bought on eBay. SIB was both a social commentary and serious economics. Polanyi's many insights have also been largely overlooked / forgotten.
The modern economy is a form of slavery. The variations are many, but the servitude is real.
Onward to localized solutions, doing whatever we can to increase our resilience and adaptability.
warm regards, charles
I very much agree with your analysis.
I have long seen myself as trapped in a system, that will do what it does, whether I think it is good or not. A system that I see as inevitably eating itself.
I can propose many solutions, but reality is that I am pissing in the wind. Fundamentally, the issue is that the vast majority of people have a stake in what is, and see no reason to take a different course. More importantly, the decision makers have a stake in the "status quo", and will likely go down with the ship before they allow change. That means, that all of us on the ship will also go down.
Solutions? The only solution I can see working is building life rafts, so that when the ship goes down, I & those I love can get on the life raft. What does that look like. Basically, it is building a local economy, with local producers, local merchants, and local ownership & control of resources. Difficult to do, but the good news is that more & more people are seeing that what we have is not working, and that they need to create an alternative. Unfortunately, this is small scale and the life raft being built is leaky, and unstable. Getting a better life raft is going to require a lot more people seeing how unstable our system actually is, and being motivated to do something different.